The guardian Al-Nasir opened, explanation of Rawdat Al-Nazir 6/1

Overview of the book فتح الولي الناصر شرح روضة الناظر 6/1 - Ali Saad Al-Duwaish: That the book "Summary of روضة الناظر وجنة المناظر" from the important books in the principles of jurisprudence according to the Hanbali school written by the حافظ ابن قدامة الحنبلي (541-620), the author in his book talks about the principles of jurisprudence, mentioning the principles of jurisprudence and the disagreement in it and the evidence for each opinion on the chosen, and it has been cared for by scholars in summarizing, refining, and explaining. Chapters of the book The reality of judgment and its categories Detailing the roots, which are the Book and the Sunnah and consensus and the continuation of evidence Clarification of the disputed roots Categories of speech and names Command and prohibition and generality and exception, obedience, and what is derived from words through their indication and signification Qiyas (analogical reasoning), which is a branch of the roots Judgment of the mujtahid who derives rulings from these evidence, and the muqallid (one who follows a legal precedent) Preferences of conflicting evidence Quoting the حافظ ابن قدامة in the introduction of his book: This is a book in which we mention the principles of jurisprudence and the disagreement in it and the evidence for each opinion on the chosen, and we clarify what we accept and respond to those who oppose us. We began with a gentle introduction at the beginning, then followed it with eight chapters: The first on the reality of judgment and its categories, The second on detailing the roots, which are the Book, the Sunnah, consensus, and continuation of evidence, The third on clarifying the disputed roots, The fourth on categories of speech and names, The fifth on command, prohibition, generality, exception, obedience, and what is derived from words through their indication and signification, The sixth on qiyas (analogical reasoning), which is a branch of the roots, The seventh on the judgment of the mujtahid who derives rulings from these evidences and the muqallid, The eighth on preferences of conflicting evidence.