The different rulings with their evidence 1/4

Authorship / Elias Dardourrd, from branches to roots, and clarification of the roots from which the differences originate and to which they return, a proof that scholars in what they deduced from rulings were not born of frivolity, that the difference is due to objective reasons excusable for such and personal inclinations, and that the mistaken is praised for it, and the correct is rewarded for it. And that this type of research returns the researcher to methods of deduction and extraction, far from the spirit of fanaticism and sectarianism that restricts rulings from their sources, and the constantly changing circumstances that require every effort and insightful mind. And this book contains several chapters related to acts of worship, personal status, and financial transactions, where the difference in ruling on such matters is read in a way that is consistent with each scholar’s effort.