Explanation of rulings, presentation and analysis of the method of reasoning and its developments by Mohamed Mustafa Shalabi

Explanation of rulings, presentation and analysis of the method of reasoning and its developments by Muhammad Mustafa Shalabi. Number of pages: 406. Cover: reinforced cardboard. Size: 17 × 25. About the book: This book is the first presentation of the most dangerous topic in the principles of jurisprudence in a way that has not been preceded by any similar work. It was the first to connect traditional principles with true principles. The book features a presentation of a group of verses of reasoning in the Quran and similar sayings of the Messenger of Allah, peace be upon him, as well as examples of reasoning by the jurists of the companions and their successors and followers. After classifying them into groups according to different purposes, it arrived at the optimal method of reasoning to be judged by the path of the scholars of the fundamentals after explaining the stance of the theologians on the reasoning of Allah’s rulings and actions. It discussed the jurists and clarified the reason for their deviation from the optimal method of the righteous predecessors and the subsequent imams of the schools of thought, to another method. It also uncovered some of the distortions of later jurists and followers of the schools in portraying issues of disagreement to expand their scope. It also discussed the interest and its position in Islamic law, clarifying what was obscure in its research and explaining the stance of the Islamic jurisprudence schools on acting upon it. When it found that interest is an element of Istihsan (juristic preference), representing its most prominent types, it concluded the research on Istihsan. It explained the stance of the four schools of thought regarding acting upon it, clarified its concept in the Hanafi school, and completed its types based on their jurisprudence. It also verified that opponents of acting upon it have worked with its content in some of their jurisprudential branches, even if they denied calling it by that name. It became clear that what they denied was something different from what the supporters worked with. This made the topic of reasoning a guiding light for researchers in the Shariah of Allah to the straight path.