The Cold War on the Arab existence – injustice to identity – part three, by: Mukhtar Al-Ghawth

The study of the book is not attached to Arabic with accusations, such as difficulty, old age, and unfitness for knowledge, and it has shown that what is attributed to it of that is partly in the context of disparagement, and justifying the call to change it. And it has clarified that there is no language in human language that is inherently difficult, and another that is inherently easy, and that in every language there is what is difficult and what is easy, and that the difficulty of the language — if its validity is assumed — does not justify changing it, but it should be considered a measure, which peoples have no choice but to adapt to. And there is nothing in languages that naturally makes them suitable or unsuitable for knowledge, and every great language was once a poor dialect, limited in spread, then it became what it became by the authority of its people, and their effort in upgrading it. And there is no meaning to the language’s old age as long as it performs what its people want, and the continuity of the Arabic language and its antiquity is a virtue among its virtues; because it connected the present Arabs with their past and future, and allowed them to benefit from their oldest heritage as they benefit from their latest, and the lack of connection of others made their written heritage from centuries ago a foreign heritage, from which they benefit only as they benefit from the heritage of foreign languages through translation.