The strange saying term in jurisprudence

The aim of the research is to clarify the terminological concept of the word (strange statement) among jurists, to mention its various examples from the books of Islamic jurisprudence heritage, to clarify the accepted criteria for judging a statement as strange, and to demonstrate the impact of the strange statement on disagreements in jurisprudential issues and the ruling on issuing fatwas based on the strange statement. Clarifying the terminological concept of (strange statement) among jurists is considered an important topic because it is a frequently used term in various sources of Islamic jurisprudence, such as traditional jurisprudential books, contemporary jurisprudential studies, and scholarly discussions, during the transmission of statements, narrations, or viewpoints within and outside the jurisprudential schools. It is also among the highly influential jurisprudential terms because it is used for critique, involving correction, disapproval, acceptance, and rejection of jurisprudential statements and opinions, whether within or outside the jurisprudential schools. It is well known to specialists in every field the importance of clarity and clarification of scientific terms, and the necessity of accuracy in their use, especially for such critical terms. Moreover, there has been no independent scientific study dedicated to this term in the jurisprudential sources and references available to the researcher.