The days of the Commune

70

Out of Stock

Product description

It was written in 1949 AD, which is, oh the virtues of history that knows no coincidences, full of dialogues almost speaking about what the Arab region is experiencing now. We are in front of a group of the Commune people, and they are moving from the peak of enthusiasm as oppressed poor workers who managed to occupy some areas and hills, and it became possible for them to claim that they pose a real threat to the ruler (Tyer) and his soldiers. We will later learn that this legendary dwarf (Tyer), as Karl Marx called him, by the way, our leftist friends consider the Commune a symbol in the entire history of the left. Tyer, who grew up in a desperately poor environment, will ally with Germany, the historical enemy of France, against the revolutionaries. These poor workers were immersed in their dream of good governance, which is inevitable! This feeling filled the revolutionaries with enthusiasm and optimism, especially since they strongly opposed Tyer’s attempts to disarm the National Guard in favor of the Germans, which made them fill the streets and alleys with joy and dance. However, what was happening at the same time was the arrogance of the (Communards) leaders over their initial victories and their abandonment of the basic concepts and values of the spirit of the revolution. Their joy increased with the occupation of the town hall while they were walking confidently toward the tragic end filled with blood, as these leaders, instead of following (the path of the revolution) to its very end, took, in their ignorance of history and its laws, to negotiations. They began to curb the reins of the masses whenever they wanted to express their struggle with revolutionary stances that warned of danger. In fact, the matter reached the peak of disappointment for the hesitant leaders when they decided that the sanctity of the (Central Bank) should not be touched, and any attempt by the revolutionaries in this regard, whether at the bank or other similar institutions, would be resisted by force. It was natural that such decisions and actions would only lead to a rupture in the ranks and the separation of comrades… and events would take their course.