Marks in Muscat research on the material structure and distribution of wealth and the historicity of laws

The time has come to pay attention to that earthly aspect of thinking, which has been excluded from the realm of collective interests as it belongs to everything daily, transient, fleeting, and slippery, and to leave behind, both a little and a lot, this attachment to the metaphysical, and to cling to the major and comprehensive theoretical issues, which in many cases have generated conflicts that many parties cannot resolve or refute clearly and reasonably. Therefore, the focus here is on economics, not in the traditional accounting sense, but in the broad philosophical sense of the word, in terms of the fact that economics is not limited to the narrow individual side (house, individual, commercial shop), but extends to those wide relationships between people and different ideologies, and between them and their areas of interest and marginalization of many other ideologies. It also extends to the complex relationships between countries and peoples in many cases, and the way many existential visions are shaped based on this aspect. Caring about this side means understanding many matters and issues (victories and defeats, regress and progress) from another perspective and different angles, and linking much of what happens around us to the land, to humans, to strategies not visible to everyone, and to those hidden alliances that will be considered later. This aspect places us in front of many common and widespread concepts, which are often used in a purely negative and idealized manner. In the context of these analyses, it is possible to address concepts such as justice, humanity, law, and others, considering them part of this earthly aspect of thinking, and not related to metaphysical positions that are often characterized by ambiguity, lack of clarity, and the impossibility of verification and refutation.