The soul of the curriculum

There are two basic criteria that knowledge does and values its worth:- a criterion that evaluates this knowledge by looking at its "contents" and "material" scientific or practical.- a criterion that evaluates this knowledge by looking at its "methods of construction" and "ways of establishing" the inferential or discursive aspects.If these two criteria are integrated and not conflicting, then it is logically certain that the constructed and established knowledge with "legitimate" methods and "accepted" bases and "proofs" is more correct and valuable than that knowledge which only adopts and accepts, because of what it contains and includes of judgments and meanings, that are neither shocking nor contradictory to what Al-Mutanabbi previously believed and acted upon.Considering knowledge by focusing on its "methods of construction" and "ways of establishing," in the context of "clarification" and "explanation" of the "rational" nature of this knowledge and thus its "obligatory" aspect, is a "methodical" perspective in knowledge in general. And a "scientific methodical" perspective in knowledge in particular.