Prejudice against identity

The study of the language is more attached to Arabic than accusations, such as difficulty, old age, and unfitness for knowledge, to which some of it is attributed, and it was during that time that I was exposed to the repulsion and justification of calling for change. There is nothing in human language that is inherently difficult and another that is easy, and in every language there is what is hard and what is easy, and the difficulty of the language — if its validity is assumed — does not justify changing it, but rather it should be respected and adapted to its capacity; nations have no choice but to adapt to it. There is nothing in languages that is inherently suitable or unsuitable for knowledge, and every great language was once a poor dialect with limited spread, then it became what it is through the power of its people and their effort in developing it. There is no meaning to the old age of a language as long as it fulfills the needs of its people, and the continuity of the life of Arabic and its antiquity is a virtue among its virtues; because it connected the present Arabs with their past and future, and allowed them to benefit from their oldest heritage as much as from their newest. The lack of connection with other languages has made their written heritage from a few centuries ago foreign heritage, from which one benefits only as one benefits from the heritage of foreign languages through translation.