Jerusalem is not Urshalim

Is the Jerusalem that is claimed to be mentioned in the Torah the same city that the Jewish holy book calls "Jerusalem," and do the two names together indicate a single specific place as the contemporary Israeli narrative claims? But, did the Torah really mention, in any of the hypothetical forms, the name "Al-Quds"—with the Arabic definite article? And does its description in the Torah match the description of Jerusalem, so that we can consider the two places as one? What I want to raise in this theoretical thesis is the following: The Torah never mentioned the name Palestine or Palestinians at all, and it did not mention "Al-Quds" in any form. All that is said about the place mentioned in the Torah as "Qadash-Quds" is intended to refer to the Arab city, which is contrary to historical truth and geographic description and has no relation to science, neither closely nor remotely. Also, the Torah does not say at all that the Al-Quds that the Children of Israel reached after the journey of wandering is Jerusalem. Doubts have hovered—regarding me—around this common assumption in historical and political writings worldwide, since I began, and throughout years of hard work, reconstructing and rebuilding the Torah narrative about Palestinian history based on the Hebrew text, where astonishing facts were revealed that had been obscured by the corrupt Orientalist imagination for the past two centuries, through the false promotion of the myth of the Jewish promised land.